LOOK! I could be considered a Terrorist Threat
You can read the whole Substack post here. Nope, you can't. Guess I'll just have to copy and paste the whole thing below. But first, some copied sentences, in case you don't read the whole thing....
..........................................................................................
ADDITION
Some may say; "Who cares? I'm not saying anything about masks or the Jab."
But!
Many who read here, are Christians.
Your Religion says abortion is wrong.
This government says abortion is ok.
What if this government decides, that your saying abortion is wrong, is "undermining public trust in government institutions" ????
That possibility, is something to worry about, isn't it?
..........................................................................................
"The White House has begun an extraordinary assault on free speech in America."
"SUMMARY OF THE TERRORISM THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES: The United
States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several
factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories... [emphasis added]"
"You read those words right."
"The government now says “misleading narratives” are the most dangerous contributor to terrorism against the United States."
"The bulletin’s next sentence:"
"These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence. [emphasis added]"
"You read those words right too."
"A federal agency says that to
“undermine public trust in government institutions” is now considered
terrorism. Speech doesn’t even have to encourage rebellion or violence
generally, much less against anyone specific. It just has to
“potentially inspire” violence."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Sooooooo, my last 2 posts, which point out the ridiculousness of masks, could be considered by our present Federal Government (Biden) to “undermine public trust in government institutions” and thus could be considered terrorism.
Does that give you a warm, fuzzy feeling???????
Does it??????
Does it??????????????
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Copied below, the whole Substack post:
Which I can not do a click-able link to. That in itself, is interesting....
That headline sounds like a joke.
It’s not.
The
White House has begun an extraordinary assault on free speech in
America. It is no longer content merely to force social media companies
to suppress dissenting views. It appears to be setting the stage to use
federal police powers.
How else to read the “National Terrorism
Advisory System Bulletin” the Department of Homeland Security issued on
Monday? Its first sentence:
SUMMARY OF THE TERRORISM THREAT TO
THE UNITED STATES: The United States remains in a heightened threat
environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment
filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories... [emphasis added]
You read those words right.
The government now says “misleading narratives” are the most dangerous contributor to terrorism against the United States.
The bulletin’s next sentence:
These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence. [emphasis added]
You read those words right too.
A
federal agency says that to “undermine public trust in government
institutions” is now considered terrorism. Speech doesn’t even have to
encourage rebellion or violence generally, much less against anyone
specific. It just has to “potentially inspire” violence.
Potentially.
Later, the bulletin explains exactly what speech the government now considers a terrorist danger:
Widespread
online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding
unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.
There’s that word misleading again.
Who’s defining “misleading”? Misleading to whom? Misleading how?
DHS February 2022 bulletin
—
I have no doubt whatsoever that I fit as a terrorist threat under these guidelines.
So
does Joe Rogan. And Tucker Carlson. After all, we’ve “undermine[d]
public trust in government institutions” about Covid and the mRNA shots
(I try not to call them vaccines anymore).
This bulletin marks an extraordinary escalation of the war on speech and the First Amendment.
The
Biden Administration has issued five bulletins since it assumed power.
Regularly issuing these warnings at all is problematic - they are not
“alerts” to warn people about specific and ongoing terrorist plots. Thus
they inevitably contain political judgment about what future threats
may be the most severe.
But none of the earlier reports contained language remotely similar to Monday’s.
The
original January 2021 bulletin highlighted “ideologically-motivated
violent extremists” and specific threats of violence against “critical
infrastructure.” The fourth discussed how foreign and domestic
extremists were trying “to inspire potential followers to conduct
attacks in the United States, including by exploiting recent events in
Afghanistan.” It added "that as of November 10, 2021, DHS is not aware
of an imminent and credible threat.”
In contrast, Monday’s
bulletin clearly equates speech with terroristic activity. That
connection may seem ridiculous and absurd. It is not.
These
public statements are not merely wallpaper. They can reflect secret
government decisions about what police or intelligence tactics are
acceptable against targeted groups.
This is not a conspiracy
theory; in 2017, Central Intelligence Agency director Mike Pompeo
publicly called Wikileaks a “non-state hostile intelligence service.” As
Yahoo News reported three years later:
More than just a
provocative talking point, the designation opened the door for agency
operatives to take far more aggressive actions, treating the
organization as it does adversary spy services.
Yahoo article about the CIA and Wikileaks
What,
if anything, are government agencies planning to do about the terrorist
threat that I and other Covid skeptics represent? I have no idea.
But
make no mistake. This bulletin marks a clear escalation of the
targeting from the highest levels of the federal government that began
last year.
Remember: in July President Biden, Jennifer Psaki, and
Surgeon General Vivek Murthy all encouraged social media companies to
clamp down on Covid vaccine skeptics less than 24 hours before Twitter began the process of deplatforming me. Last week Psaki specifically targeted Rogan, who has a much larger audience.
Now, though, the government appears to want to target my First Amendment rights directly.
—
The stakes here could not be higher.
What
if our worst fears about the mRNA Covid vaccines come to pass? What if
they turn out to have long-term immunosuppressive effects that lead not
just to more infections but to more serious illness over time?
I want to be clear. I’m not saying they do. Or will. But both the epidemiological data and the new cellular studies suggest the risk of such an outcome is non-zero.
It
is not hard to imagine the anger and unrest that would accompany such
revelations. The entire public health establishment and nearly every
politician and elite institution in the United States has strongly
encouraged Americans to take these shots. Many did so willingly, but
millions more agreed to do so only because they faced unemployment if
they did not comply. The defense that we just didn’t know, we took them ourselves, will be thin indeed.
But
if pointing out problems with vaccines - or even potential problems -
is not speech but terrorism, then the government can do what it needs to
make the “terrorists” go away.
And we will be one step closer to 1984.
NOTE:
I have never done this before, and I probably won’t again for a while.
But if you’ve gotten this far, I hope you will consider supporting
Unreported Truths with a subscription. I don’t know how long or messy
this fight may become, and I’m eager for all the help I can get. (And if
you sold your Bitcoin at the high last year and want a signed copy of
PANDEMIA - I’m still sending them to people who become founding
members.)
No matter what, I will not back down. This threat to free speech cannot go unchallenged. I hope you will join me.
.
.
.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
